DeepSeek’s R1: Transforming AI Economics, Not AI Itself 

A Shift in AI Economics, Not AI Quality 

Let’s be clear—R1 isn’t setting a new standard for AI capability. It’s not outperforming the best models in existence. Instead, its real breakthrough lies in its efficiency: achieving comparable results with far less computational power and at a fraction of the cost of other models. 

DeepSeek didn’t need a cutting-edge supercomputer or access to vast proprietary datasets. Instead, they built R1 using relatively modest, consumer-grade hardware. And because R1 is open-source, businesses can study, adapt, and build on top of it freely. 

This doesn’t immediately change the game for end users—but for the industry? It’s a serious shake-up. 

Why OpenAI and NVIDIA Are Watching Closely 

The release of R1 has rattled the AI investment landscape. For companies like OpenAI and NVIDIA, this development isn’t just interesting—it’s potentially disruptive. 

OpenAI has long relied on three major competitive advantages: 

• Intellectual property (IP): Their models are proprietary, with no public insight into how they’re built. 

• Funding: The hardware required to build AI models is expensive. OpenAI has more money than most. 

• Compute barriers: Training state-of-the-art AI requires immense computational power and access to high-end data centers. Obtaining the necessary hardware is challenging due to supply chain issues, competition, and reliance on cloud provider partnerships. Having the money isn’t always enough—you need industry connections too. 

DeepSeek has undermined all three. By proving that cutting-edge AI can be developed at a fraction of OpenAI’s cost, R1 challenges the idea that AI leadership requires billion-dollar R&D budgets and access to famously hard-to-obtain hardware. 

And then there’s NVIDIA. The company’s meteoric stock rise has been fueled by the belief that AI will continue to demand ever-increasing amounts of high-performance GPUs that only NVIDIA could provide. But, when models like R1 start to deliver competitive performance using significantly less hardware, that assumption starts to look shaky. Of course, demand for compute isn’t disappearing overnight—if anything, democratizing AI development could lead to a broader base of companies training their own models. But for now, DeepSeek has raised an uncomfortable question: Does everyone really need to keep throwing money at high-end chips to stay in the AI race? 

What Happens Next? 

The long-term impact of R1 is hard to predict, but there are a few possible scenarios: 

1. The commercial AI model faces pressure. If companies can build competitive AI for a fraction of OpenAI’s costs, how long can OpenAI justify its massive R&D bills? The answer is probably “for now,” but not indefinitely. 

1. A new efficiency arms race begins. If DeepSeek’s approach can be scaled up and combined with OpenAI’s resources, we might see a leap in model performance. This could push AI companies to rethink their development strategies. 

1. A new wave of AI adoption emerges. With costs dropping, businesses of all sizes could start developing bespoke AI models tailored to their specific needs. This would create new demand for compute—just not in the way NVIDIA originally expected. 

O