You miss requirements
64% of teams lose proposals because requirements were missed or misunderstood. General AI tools have no way to check what the evaluator is actually looking for.
Our customers see a 22% average increase in win rates, compared to just +2.5% from Copilot.
Sources: Transforming the RFP Process, 2025 · Forrester TEI Report

Many proposal teams are running into the same wall. Significant gaps. Real limitations. Because writing fast and winning proposals are two completely different things.
64% of teams lose proposals because requirements were missed or misunderstood. General AI tools have no way to check what the evaluator is actually looking for.
Writers dig through SharePoint, open old PDFs, copy and paste outdated case studies. The right evidence exists somewhere. Finding it is the problem.
Generate a fast draft. Realise requirements are missing. Add evidence manually. Rewrite sections. Fix compliance issues. Rewrite again during review. Fast start. Slow finish.
Everything your business development team learned about the client, the competition, and the opportunity disappears when the proposal team takes over.
No structured compliance checking. No scoring alignment. You find out what was missed when the evaluator tells you, not before.
This is a placeholder text about AutogenAi industries, not taking more than 2 or 3 lines.
Spreadsheets. Email threads. Shared drives. Manual compliance trackers. Every disconnected tool is a place where requirements get missed and scores drop.